Coca Cola Co. v. Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
At the present state of the above case, a question of practice has arisen with regard to interrogatories by the defendant to the plaintiff after the pleadings have been completed. One question presented is whether the court has discretion to limit the interrogatories by one party to the other to a reasonable nuhiber. Another question is whether interrpgatories can properly be maintained whenffhey seek answers only with regard to details of evidence. Still another question is whether answers should be compelled to interrogatories which call for research work and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Koke Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Union Pac. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- Nichols v. Sanborn Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
- Landry v. O'Hara Vessels, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. North Carolina Pulp Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Atlantic Northern Airlines, Inc. v. SchwimmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- William L. Bracey, Jr. v. John GrenobleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Bowles v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1945
- United States v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1942
- Josephine Heilig v. Studebaker Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.