Lee v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Jas. M. Troutt, Judge. The facts 'are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
VICTOR E. SHAW, J., pro tem.
While in form this action is one to quiet title, its real purpose was to have declared void two instruments in so far as they affected the lot described in the complaint and owned by plaintiff. One of these instruments is a mortgage executed by plaintiff, together with her mother and brother, on August 1, 1913, to the Hibernia Savings and Loan Society, upon property which included that herein involved. The other is a deed of trust executed by the same parties on August 6,1913, whereby the same property was conveyed to R. McColgan and F. W. Morrison, trustees, to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of ForresterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- McKay v. GesfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Lackman v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Hakes Investment Co. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Fritz v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Dial v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Sparks v. SparksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. Barth Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Merry v. GaribaldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.