Legal Opinion
Falk v. Falk
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 1941No. Civ. 6645PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The plaintiff was awarded an interlocutory decree of divorce on the grounds of extreme cruelty and adultery. It was adjudged that the community property of the spouses should be divided equally between them. From that portion of the decree which determined that certain-described stocks and securities belong to the defendant as his separate property, and from that portion which limited the award to plaintiff of only one-half of the community property, this separate appeal was perfected.
The defendant is a physician and surgeon. He was previously married. At the time of his marriage to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Title Ins. and Trust Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Cavanaugh v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Britton v. HammellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re Esate of CudworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Hunter v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1948
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.