Savings & Loan Society v. Burnett
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Action to quiet title. The appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial.
On the twenty-second day of May, 1868, Denis Ma-honey, the then owner of the lands in controversy, was indebted to the Savings and Loan Society in the sum of $20,000, gold coin of the United States, for moneys borrowed. Upon that date he executed, as party of the first part, a deed of trust to Burr and Dean as parties of the second part; the Savings and Loan Society, as party of the third part, was the beneficiary of the trust, which was for the following declared purposes:
“ To secure the payment to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Levins v. RovegnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Tapia v. DemartiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Bath v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Hamilton v. LubukeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Maupin v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.