Legal Opinion
Hunter v. Sparling
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 28, 1948No. Civ. 13724PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Plaintiff brought this action against the state superintendent of banks acting as liquidator of the Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd., to recover from the bank the sum of $20,835.50 allegedly due from the bank to plaintiff as the balance due on his retirement allowance. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff defendant appeals.
It'is admitted that plaintiff worked for the bank, located in San Francisco, from 1892 to 1941; that in November of 1941, plaintiff contemplated retiring from his employment; that at that time plaintiff was informed, in writing, that the bank would pay him, as a retirement…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- French v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.