Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Dahm

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1950No. Civ. 17811PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

At the opening of the trial of this action and before counsel had made any statement or offered any evidence, the court said/‘I will entertain a motion by the defend ant for a judgment on the pleadings without taking any testimony.” Whereupon defendants’ counsel made such motion. After a colloquy between court and counsel the court said, “You had better state in your motion that the complaint on file herein shows the adjudication on the face of the complaint ...” Counsel for defendant accepted the court’s invitation and included the latter as a ground for the motion. The court granted the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rannard v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Auerbach v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Quivey v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Bates v. Escondido Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lortz v. ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Renshaw v. Happy Valley Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Tracy v. FerreraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Campbell v. Republic Indemnity Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Clark v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API