Legal Opinion
Clark v. City of Pasadena
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 8, 1951No. Civ. 18108PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
By this appeal we are required to construe portions of the charter of the city of Pasadena relating to pensions of retired members of the police department.
Petitioner is a police officer of the city of Pasadena. He filed with the retirement board an application for retirement upon the pension to which he claims he is entitled under the provisions of the city charter adopted in 1919. Upon denial of his application he filed in the superior court a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the board to comply with his demand. Defendants answered and pleaded as a defense that he is entitled to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- County of Los Angeles v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- County of Tulare v. City of DinubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Adams v. WolffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Agostini v. StryculaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Contractor's Safety Ass'n v. California Compensation InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. MelchorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Hom v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Jones-Hamilton Co. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.