Legal Opinion

Rannard v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1945No. L. A. 19157PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, have appealed from a judgment on the pleadings which was rendered in response to a motion made by defendant Lockheed Aircraft Corporation at the commencement of the trial after an objection to plaintiffs’ introduction of any evidence had been sustained. Plaintiffs moved for a new trial (Allen v. California Mutual Building & Loan Assn., 40 Cal.App.2d 374 [104 P.2d 851]). That motion was denied and plaintiffs have also appealed from the order thereupon entered. That order is nonappealable (Code Civ. Proc., § 963), and for that reason the appeal therefrom…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Champagne v. A. HamBurger & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Bergen v. Tulare County Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1916

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Burks v. Poppy Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Landeros v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Canifax v. Hercules Powder Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API