Legal Opinion

Bates v. Escondido Union High School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 1933No. Docket No. 1049PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment on the pleadings which was rendered in favor of Escondido Union High School District of San Diego County and the Grossmont Union High School District of San Diego County, both duly organized and existing union high school districts.

In considering whether the judgment is supported by the record it is only necessary for us to determine whether or not the complaint states a cause of action against the Union High School Districts of Escondido and Grossmont. In order to support such a judgment there must be an entire absence of allegation of some necessary fact or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pittam v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Leymel v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Ahern v. Livermore Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Maede v. Oakland High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Raymond v. Paradise Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Artukovich v. AstendorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Rannard v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Casterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Lehmuth v. Long Beach Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API