Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Thornton
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing to vacate the judgment. J. C. B. Hebra rd, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Upon a former appeal in this action (Hibernia etc. Soc. v. Thornton, 109 Cal. 427; 50 Am. St. *482Rep. 52), the judgment was reversed upon the ground that it appeared from the findings that the promissory note upon which the action was brought had been, at the time of its execution, secured by a mortgage upon real property, and that by reason of the provisions in section 726 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the makers were not liable to an action upon the note independent of a suit to foreclose the mortgage. When the cause again came on for trial in the superior court, the defendant moved for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burkett v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kelley v. KriessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- King v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- De Toro v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by40 opinions
- Rannard v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Salter v. UlrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Faxon v. All PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Hayt v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.