Legal Opinion
Tracy v. Ferrera
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 5, 1956No. Civ. 16887PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DRAPER, J. pro tem. *
Defendants’ demurrer to the fourth amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend, and their motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted. Plaintiffs appeal from the resulting judgment.
Appellants and respondents own homes on adjoining city-lots. Appellants’ first cause of action alleges that between April 1 and July 31, 1950, while appellants were absent, respondents erected walls, foundations, pipes and vents upon appellants’ property. This cause of action clearly is in trespass. The original complaint was filed November 3, 1953. The demurrer specified Code…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Guilliams v. Hollywood HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Dauberman v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Bertram v. OrlandoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Willson v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Maxon v. Security Insurance of New Haven ConnecticutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Field-Escandon v. DeMannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Lortz v. ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.