Langstaff v. Mitchell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, J., pro tem.
This is an action to quiet title to certain lots upon which plaintiff Jameson Petroleum Company claims to have an oil and gas lease. Defendant denies the existence of said lease and by way of affirmative defense alleges that he is the owner of said lots under and by virtue of a tax deed executed to him by the tax collector of Los Angeles County.
Goldie Langstaff was joined as a plaintiff in the original complaint, but plaintiff Jameson Petroleum Company filed an amended complaint, in which the said Langstaff did not join as a party plaintiff. Judgment was rendered in favor…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- German-American Sav. Bank v. GollmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Bussenius v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Etienne v. KendallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Gottstein v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Tietke v. ForrestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Miller v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- O'NEIL v. SpillaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Peterson v. VakNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- San Juan Gold Co. v. San Juan Ridge Mutual Water Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Ayars v. FaustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.