Legal Opinion

Tietke v. Forrest

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1923No. Civ. No. 4457PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

This is an action brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as a result of the explosion of a gas stove purchased from and installed by the defendant. The cause was tried before a jury and a verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiff, and judgment was entered in accordance therewith, from which judgment defendant now appeals.

It appears that at the time of the occurrence which gave rise to this action, and for some years previously thereto, the defendant conducted a business of selling and installing gas stoves for cooking purposes in the city of Los Angeles,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Schmidt v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Smith v. ButtnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone & Co.California Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Vaccarezza v. SanguinettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. O'NEIL v. SpillaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Greenstone v. Claretian Theological SeminaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Miller v. Pacific Constructors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API