Legal Opinion

Bussenius v. Warden

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1925No. Docket No. 4321PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Action to quiet title. The plaintiffs are the owners of the described real property unless their title has been divested by reason of a tax deed dated and executed on the second day of July, 1920, by the tax collector of the county of Los Angeles to Grace P. Warden, who is defendant and appellant herein.

The defense to the action was founded on said deed, of which a copy is annexed to the answer, as exhibit “A” thereof. .The plaintiffs did not, after receiving a copy of the answer, file with the clerk any affidavit denying the genuineness or due execution of the deed. Section 448 of the Code…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Henderson v. De TurkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Miller v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Walton v. City of Red BluffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Gottstein v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. City of Compton v. BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Stoneman v. FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API