Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Vak

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1955No. 33742PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

The relief appellant sought by this action was that his leasehold of described land for a term of 3 years commencing with March 1, 1952, be quieted and con firmed in him free of adverse claim of appellees; that they be barred from asserting any interest or right in or to the land or the possession thereof adverse to the leasehold of appellant; and that appellees be enjoined from entering or being upon the land and from interfering with, cutting, or harvesting grain then growing or standing on the land. The district court heard the evidence of appellant, sustained a motion of appellees for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Elk Fork Oil & Gas Co. v. JenningsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia · 1898
  2. Castle Brook Carbon Black Co. v. FerrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Langstaff v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Brannum v. Spring Lakes Country Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. Cozart v. CrenshawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sproul v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Beren Corp. v. SpaderNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Banks v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Fisher v. StuckeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Peterson v. VakNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API