Etienne v. Kendall
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This cause was transferred to the supreme court after decision and judgment in the second division of the district court of appeal of the first district, on petition of the appellant, who. contends that the decision is in error in holding, first, that the representations made by the defendant were merely statements of his opinion, and not of facts, and, second, that the plaintiff treated the answer of the defendant as raising an issue as to the falsity of the representations charged. Upon a further consideration of the matter we are satisfied that under the facts of this particular…
2Cited by26 opinions
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Haney v. TakakuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Stroud v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Wiley v. EasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Criss v. Angelus Hospital Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.