Legal Opinion
Miller v. McKenna
California Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1944No. L. A. 18157PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The plaintiff sued to quiet title to 103 lots in the city of Los Angeles. His title is based on a sheriff’s deed executed in pursuance of a mortgage foreclosure judg*777ment and sale. The defendants’ claims of title depend upon the validity of certain tax deeds. The plaintiff recovered judgment quieting his title to all but ten of the lots. He appealed from that portion of the judgment quieting in the defendants the title to those ten lots.
Nine of the ten lots involved on the appeal were sold to the state in 1912 for delinquent 1911 taxes. In 1917 they were sold by the state at public sale to the…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- TERRETT & OTHERS v. Taylor & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. Heinszen & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Zaslow v. KroenertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Flournoy v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- City of Sausalito v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Taschner v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.