Legal Opinion

Douglass v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1935No. L. A. 15375PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant City of Los Angeles in an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff when *126an automobile she was driving collided with an abutment of a bridge alleged to have been maintained in a dangerous and defective condition by the city on Adams Street.

At the trial the city interposed an objection to the introduction of any evidence on behalf - of the plaintiff, on the ground that it did not appear from the pleadings that a claim had been filed with the city council as a prerequisite to the maintenance of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Davoust v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Beeson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Rafferty v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Spencer v. City of CalipatriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API