Legal Opinion

Polk v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1945No. L. A. 19187PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment for damages against defendants for personal injuries suffered .by him as the result of a fall from a tree alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendants in maintaining an electric power line in a dangerous condition through said tree.

Rancho Street in defendant city of Los Angeles is an east-west street which at the place involved carried little traffic. Norman Levin owns a parcel of property on the north side of the street. There are growing along the south line of his property parallel to and near the street, six eucalyptus trees and one oak tree.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Robinson v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Clinkscales v. CarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Jolley v. ClemensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Committee of Seven Thousand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API