Legal Opinion
Spencer v. City of Calipatria
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 24, 1935No. Civ. 1167PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered after a demurrer to an amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend.
The action is one for damages on account of injuries alleged to have been suffered by the appellant on November 1, 1932, through a defective sidewalk within the respondent city. As conceded by the appellant, no verified claim was filed in accordance with the statutes adopted in 1931 (Stats. 1931, pp. 2475 and 2476; Deering’s Gen. Laws, Acts 5149 and 5150). The complaint does allege that a written claim was delivered to each of the defendants, to the city clerk and to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Thompson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Bancroft v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Uttley v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Western Salt Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Loe Et Ux v. LenhardOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.