Legal Opinion

Rafferty v. City of Marysville

California Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1929No. Docket No. Sac. 4209PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Respondent was awarded by the court, sitting without a jury, a judgment against appellant, City of Marysville, in the sum of $7,744 and costs of suit on account of personal injuries sustained by her as the result of a fall caused by a dangerous and defective condition of a sidewalk which appellant caused to be constructed and maintained at the southwest corner of the intersection of Tenth and I Streets. Said injuries were inflicted on the first day of May, 1926, and consisted of a fracture of the left ankle above the joint and in the joint, and also a fracture of the olecranon process of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gorman v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Dawson v. Tulare Union High SchoolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Huff v. Compton City Grammar School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API