Legal Opinion
Beeson v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 1931No. Docket No. 708PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Appellant is the mother of Hal Beeson, who was on May 29, 1926, a minor of the age of ten years. On this date he was playing in a storm drain near the intersection of Venice Boulevard and LaBrea Avenue in the City of Los Angeles, fell into a water hole and was drowned. His father, Hal L. Beeson, presented a claim for damages for the death of his minor son to the city council of the City of Los Angeles on August 30, 1926, which claim was disallowed and payment thereon refused. Thereafter, on or about September 30, 1927 (probably 1926) he deserted and abandoned appellant.
On or about May 24,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Barrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone & Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Reynolds v. WillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- George v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- King v. LennenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Demmer v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.