Legal Opinion

Bank of America v. Sanchez

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1934No. Civ. 8885PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, J., pro tem.

Appellant, plaintiff below, as successor in interest of First National Trust & Savings Bank of Whittier, sued to recover a deficiency on a note, after sale under the trust deed securing the same. The defendant makers were husband and wife, and the property described in the trust deed was found by the trial court to be separate property of the husband. The note in question was given in 1928 to the Whittier bank in the sum of $25,600, on the husband’s application for a loan, to liquidate previous indebtedness of the husband' to that bank, $12,500 of which was evidenced by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Champion v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Divani v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Robbins v. LawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Noll v. BaidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Scovill v. GuyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Terry v. BenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Rutherford v. Rideout BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Stevens v. MarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Regus v. SchartkoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API