Bank of America v. Sanchez
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIS, J., pro tem.
Appellant, plaintiff below, as successor in interest of First National Trust & Savings Bank of Whittier, sued to recover a deficiency on a note, after sale under the trust deed securing the same. The defendant makers were husband and wife, and the property described in the trust deed was found by the trial court to be separate property of the husband. The note in question was given in 1928 to the Whittier bank in the sum of $25,600, on the husband’s application for a loan, to liquidate previous indebtedness of the husband' to that bank, $12,500 of which was evidenced by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Champion v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Divani v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Robbins v. LawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Noll v. BaidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Scovill v. GuyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by24 opinions
- Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Terry v. BenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Rutherford v. Rideout BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Stevens v. MarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Regus v. SchartkoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.