Legal Opinion
Sime v. Malouf
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 14, 1949No. Civ. 16847PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
This is an appeal by defendants A. B. Malouf, W. B. Malouf, B. B. Malouf, Bertrand L. Ball, Sperry Lawson, Ben Mar Hills Corporation and Ben Mar Hills Apartments, Inc., from a judgment against them in the amount of some $77,000 for fraud and conspiracy to defraud. The complaint originally named various other defendants among whom were five individuals who were directors of Edgerton, Riley and Walter, a dissolved corporation, at the time of its dissolution, Paul T. Sunday and Zack J. Parmer. Sunday died during the pendency of the action and a nonsuit was granted in favor of his personal…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Johnson v. PeckhamTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Bellefonte Re Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Argonaut Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Universal Reinsurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Argonaut Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- In Re ReillyBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Second Circuit · 2000
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.