Legal Opinion
Rutherford v. Rideout Bank
California Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1938No. Sac. 4999PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This case was taken over by this court on petition for hearing after decision by the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District. The action is brought against Robert J. Finnie and the Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association as the successor of the Rideout Bank to recover damages for fraud. A judgment for damages in the sum of $12,880 was recovered in the lower court. From this judgment the defendant bank alone appeals.
The trial court found, in accordance with the allegations of the amended complaint, that, in December, 1920, at the time of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Otis Elevator Co. v. First Nat'l Bank of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Speck v. WylieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. Hydrolevel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Sanchez v. South Hoover HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.