Legal Opinion
Regus v. Schartkoff
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1957No. Civ. 22377PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered on an order sustaining defendants’ demurrer to the first amended complaint, referred to as the complaint, without leave to amend. The complaint is in four counts.
Count 1
Count I alleges that on July 2, 1953, plaintiff sustained injuries resulting from a bite inflicted by a dog owned by defendants Carl and Anna Seharikoff. The original complaint was filed April 2, 1956. In an effort to toll the statute of limitations and estop the Schartkoffs from raising the statute, Count I alleges that on July 7, 1953, September 7, 1953, December 1, 1953,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Carruth v. FritchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Miller v. Yokohama Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Tarmann v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- John R. v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.