Legal Opinion

Noll v. Baida

California Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1927No. Docket No. L.A. 7900PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This action was instituted to recover the purchase price of eight oriental rugs purchased by plaintiff of defendant. The ground upon which said recovery is sought is that defendant falsely and fraudulently represented the quality and character of said rugs at the time of their purchase. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount of said purchase price. The defendant has appealed from said judgment, and the matter is now before us upon a record prepared under the provisions of section 958a of the Code of Civil Procedure.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Truett v. OnderdonkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Stewart Howell v. . KeteltasNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  5. Everett v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Divani v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Bank of America v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Chamberlain v. Ventura County Civil Service Com.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Eade v. ReichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API