Robbins v. Law
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John Hunt, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of.the court.
1Opinion of the Court
KOFORD, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal following an order of the superior court sustaining, without leave to amend, defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended . complaint. The cause of action alleged is assault or rape alleged to have been committed by defendant upon plaintiff on the twenty-first day of October, 1916.
The demurrer, which was sustained without leave to amend, pleaded the statute of limitations. The action was commenced April 2, 1919, and is barred by the provisions of section 340, subdivision 3, of the Code of Civil Procedure, unless there…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bacon v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Champion v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Moore v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Rheingans v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Haviland v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Steinhart v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Barbara A. v. John G.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Richelle L. v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Bank of America v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.