Legal Opinion

Divani v. Donovan

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 11083PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action for damages resulting from the fraudulent representations of the defendants Donovan in the sale of real and personal property to the plaintiff.

The defendant Jeanette G. Donovan, the mother of the defendant Jack Donovan, was the record owner of a lot improved by a residence and garage known as 13047 San Vicente Boulevard, Los Angeles. On April 30, 1926, the plaintiff entered into a written contract with the defendant Jack Donovan to purchase this piece of property, including all furniture and furnishings, pipe-organ, etc., for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Herdan v. HansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Crystal Pier Amusement Co. v. CannanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API