Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Marco

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1956No. Civ. 21559PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit in an action in which he sought damages for breach of contract, fraud, money had and received and goods sold and delivered.

Under familiar rules of appellate procedure in considering the propriety of a nonsuit, we must resolve every evidentiary conflict in plaintiff’s favor, accept as true all evidence adduced, direct or indirect, supportive of plaintiff’s case and indulge in every legitimate inference which may be drawn from such evidence for plaintiff’s benefit. (Aguirre v. City of Los Angeles, 46 Cal.2d 841, 844 [299 P.2d 862]; Singer v. Marx,…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. City of Hope National Medical Center v. Genentech, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Parish v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Delos v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Fischer v. KletzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API