Legal Opinion

Chew Hing Lung v. Wise

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 22, 1900No. 36PublishedCited by 57 opinions

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. The statement of the case will be found in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Peckham

The question in this case, which comes before us on certiorari, is. whether certain merchandise imported into this country is entitled to free entry or is subject to duty. The merchandise is claimed to be tapioca, and the question arises under the tariff act of October 1, 1890, c. 1244, 26 Stat. 567. Paragraph 323 (page 588) of the statute reads as follows:

“ 323. Starch, including all preparations, from whatever substance produced, fit for use as starch, two cents per pound.” Paragraph 730 (page 610) of the “ free list,” reads as follows:
“ 730. Tapioca, cassava or cassady.”

The government,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reiche v. Smythe, CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Magone v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Robertson v. SalomonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Arthur v. LaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Arthur v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. United States v. BokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. United States v. Lorsch & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  5. Brougham v. Blanton Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API