Legal Opinion

United States v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 17, 1926No. 2672PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The importer made nine entries of merchandise at the port of Detroit, under the Tariff Act of 1922. The entries described the goods as “cottonwood veneer panels” in two instances, “cottonwood veneer,” in four, “built-up wood,” in one, and “three-ply cottonwood veneer” in two. The collector, in each case, classified the same for duty as manufactures of wood under paragraph 410 of said act at *233K per centum ad valorem. The importer protested, claiming the goods to be' properly dutiable under paragraph 403 of said act at 20 per centum ad valorem as veneers of wood. In his reports made in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maddock v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. United States v. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Hamfton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. United States v. NordlingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  5. Pritchard & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Borneo Sumatra Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Hy-Glow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. C. T. Takahashi & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  4. Pioneer Transfer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API