Legal Opinion
United States v. Stone
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 12, 1928No. 3010PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeaham, Presiding Judge
This appeal involves the proper classification of a large number of importations of so-called asbestos shingles, entered at various ports. *83These goods were, in each case, classified as manufactures of asbestos under paragraph 1401 of the Tariff Act of 1922. The importer protested, claiming free entry for the goods, as shingles, under paragraph 1660 of said act. The protests were consolidated and so heard by the Customs Court.
On the hearing before the Customs Court the Government offered in evidence the record in Hampton, jr., & Co. v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 490, T. D. 40695, and,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Markell v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Floral Arts Studios v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Timber Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Jacques Isler Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Blondheim v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.