Legal Opinion

Knauth v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 11, 1911No. 137PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Tbansfebbed from United States Circuit Court for Southern District of New York, G. A. 6910 (T. D. 29762).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise involved in this case Consists of paper cardboard upon which has been printed or pasted what are conceded to be lithographic prints, ornamental in design and color. It is divided into thr.ee classes: (1) Flat cardboards of different sizes and shapes, intended to be put together to form wall pockets and containing cheap attachments, such as thermometers, calendars, mirrors, pincushions, etc.; (2) the same as class 1, except that there were no attachments to the same; and (3) like flat pieces of cardboard of different sizes, not intended for use as wall pockets and free of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Saltonstall v. WiebuschSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Isaacs v. JonasSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Hamfton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Jackson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Sheldon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API