County of Los Angeles v. Riley
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The County of Los Angeles, by this proceeding in mandamus, seeks to compel the respondent state officials to transfer to the county certain funds collected under the terms of Statutes of 1935, page 1312, and now on deposit in the state treasury, to the credit of the Motor Vehicle License Fee Fund, as expressly provided in section 9 (c) of the above-mentioned act. Respondents have refused to make the transfer for the same reason set forth in City of Los Angeles v. Riley, S. F. No. 15672 (ante, p. 621 [59 Pac. (2d) 137]), this day decided. Return to the petition has been made by way of general…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- County of San Mateo v. CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- County of Los Angeles v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- County of Sacramento v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Rossi v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.