Legal Opinion

Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. Felt

California Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 14392PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandate, to compel respondent, as secretary of the hoard of directors of Golden Gate Bridge and Highway District, to sign certain bonds proposed to be issued by said district. Respondent justifies his refusal by the claim that the bonds are invalid. A brief review of the history of the district is necessary for an understanding of the questions raised by this proceeding.

In 1923 the legislature enacted a statute, the purpose of which is thus expressed in its title: “An act to provide for the incorporation and management of bridge and highway districts and to…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Hopkins v. Clemson Agricultural College of South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Lillard v. MeltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Estado Libre Asociado v. AguayoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
  2. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
  5. National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API