Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El Dorado
California Supreme Court
Decided August 17, 1971No. Sac. 7896PublishedCited by 157 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
The Attorney General, on behalf of the People of the State of California, seeks a writ of mandate commanding the Counties of El Dorado and Placer to pay to the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (Agency) the amounts of money respectively allotted to them by the Agency as being necessary to support its activities. We issued an alternative writ of mandate to which respondents have made return by answer. The issues thus presented to us are of great concern to California, to its neighbors and, indeed, to the entire country.
The controversy which we are required to review focuses…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sailors v. Board of Ed. of Kent Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Purdy & Fitzpatrick v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by157 opinions
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Britt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Scott v. City of Indian WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Committee of Seven Thousand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.