Legal Opinion

Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1987No. L.A. 32145PublishedCited by 880 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PANELLI, J.

In Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior Court (1982) 32 Cal.3d 211 [185 Cal.Rptr. 270, 649 P.2d 912] (hereafter Commodore Home), we held that a court may award punitive damages in a civil suit for job discrimination pursuant to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA or Act) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.).1 The issue in the present case is whether the FEHA authorizes the Fair Employment and Housing Commission (Commission or the commission) to impose punitive damages, a question left unresolved in Commodore Home.2 (Id. at p. 220.) As will appear, we conclude…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Great American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NovotnySupreme Court of the United States · 1979

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by880 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

875 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API