Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PANELLI, J.
In Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior Court (1982) 32 Cal.3d 211 [185 Cal.Rptr. 270, 649 P.2d 912] (hereafter Commodore Home), we held that a court may award punitive damages in a civil suit for job discrimination pursuant to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA or Act) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.).1 The issue in the present case is whether the FEHA authorizes the Fair Employment and Housing Commission (Commission or the commission) to impose punitive damages, a question left unresolved in Commodore Home.2 (Id. at p. 220.) As will appear, we conclude…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Great American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NovotnySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by880 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
875 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.