Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Legg

California Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1936No. Sac. 5018PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, J.

In this proceeding the petitioner asks for a peremptory writ of mandate, to compel respondent, as Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles, to sign certain tax anticipation notes proposed to be issued by the county under authority of section 3719 of the Political Code (Stats. 1935, p. 1600, chap. 523). Respondent has refused to sign the notes, and contends that for various reasons the proposed notes, if issued, will be invalid, and that therefore he is under no legal obligation to sign them.

The first sentence of said section 3719 reads as follows: “ When funds shall…

2Cited by46 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. San Francisco Unified School District v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Geiger v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API