Legal Opinion

The Housing Authority v. Dockweiler

California Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1939No. L. A. 17273PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

In this proceeding for a writ of mandamus, petitioner, The Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles, seeks to compel the respondent, its chairman, to perform certain duties alleged to be enjoined upon him by law. The cause is presented on general demurrer, respondent basing his refusal to act upon the asserted uneonstitutionality of the statute under and by virtue of the provisions of which the petitioner was created and vested with power.

In order to properly consider and determine the issues involved in this proceeding it is necessary that some reference be made to the legislative…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Green v. FrazierSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. California Housing Finance Agency v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Escobedo v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. County of Alameda v. JanssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API