County of Sacramento v. Chambers
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District to compel the State Controller to draw his warrant in favor of petitioner in payment of his claim arising under the state tuberculosis law. The facts are stated in the opinion of the ^ourt. Hugh B. Bradford, District Attorney, and Kemper B. Campbell, Attorney for State Board of Health, for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an original application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, as state controller, to draw his warrant in favor of the petitioner for the sum of $2,299.30, in payment of the claim of said petitioner arising under an act of the legislature of 1915, entitled: “An act to provide for the establishment and maintenance of a bureau of tuberculosis under the direction of the state board of health; defining its powers and duties; providing for the granting of state aid to cities, counties, cities and counties and groups of counties for the support and care of persons afflicted with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stevenson v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bourn v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Ex Parte HaydenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- County of Sacramento v. PfundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by28 opinions
- County of Alameda v. JanssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- County of Bergen v. Port of New York AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- County of Los Angeles v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- County of Tulare v. City of DinubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- City & County of San Francisco v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.