Legal Opinion

United States v. Lanier

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 2, 1999No. ARMY 9700598PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON RECONSIDERATION

ECKER, Judge:

A panel of officer and enlisted members sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of aggravated assault with a loaded firearm and willful discharge of a firearm in violation of Articles 128 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 928 and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ], The approved sentence included a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for six months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances,1 and reduction to the grade of Private El.

In our memorandum opinion, dated 16 March 1999, we rejected…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  5. United States v. Damatta-OliveraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. JenkinsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  2. United States v. AndreozziArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  3. United States v. DanielsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  4. United States v. Private E1 JOCELYN R. FRANKLINArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API