Legal Opinion
United States v. Maxwell
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided November 21, 1996No. 95-0751; Crim.App. No. 30704PublishedCited by 159 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Chief Judge:
Colonel Maxwell was convicted, contrary to his pleas, by a general court-martial composed of members at Goodfellow Air Force Base, Texas, of four specifications alleging violations of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. According to ¶ 60c(1), Part IV, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (1995 ed.):
Article 134 makes punishable acts in three categories of offenses not specifically covered in any other article of the code. These are referred to as “clauses 1, 2, and 3” of Article 134. Clause 1 offenses involved [sic] disorders…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. WarshakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Guest v. LeisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Warshak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. QuintanillaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.