United States v. Private E1 JOCELYN R. FRANKLIN
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
A military judge sitting as a special court-martial convicted appellant, consistent with her pleas, of making, drawing, uttering, or delivering a check, draft, or order and thereafter wrongfully and dishonorably failing to maintain sufficient funds (three specifications), in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The military judge sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for six months. Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, the convening authority limited confinement to sixty days and otherwise…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. NapierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
- United States v. LoganU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. GreeneU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
- United States v. PerkinsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Captain MARTIN JIMENEZ-CONTRERASArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020