Legal Opinion

United States v. Daniels

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided July 12, 1999No. ARMY 9700601PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW

NOVAK, Judge:

Contrary to her pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of making a false official statement and aggravated assault, in violation of Articles 107 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 907 and 928 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for six months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El. After initial review pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ, we determined that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. DeanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  3. United States v. OliveroUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  5. United States v. BrickeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. AndreozziArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API