Legal Opinion
United States v. Andreozzi
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided November 4, 2004No. ARMY 9800870PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAREY, Chief Judge.
A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas,1 of rape, forcible sodomy, assault consummated by battery, burglary, kidnapping, and solicitation of another to assist in escape from pretrial confinement (two specifications), in violation of Articles 120, 125, 128, 129, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 925, 928, 929, and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The court members sentenced appellant to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty-seven years, forfeiture of all pay…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Specialist JONATHAN R. ZAKArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
- Andreozzi v. United States ArmyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
- United States v. Staff Sergeant DANIEL GASKINSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010
- United States v. Staff Sergeant DANIEL GASKINSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010