Legal Opinion

United States v. Frady

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 24, 1982No. 80-1595PublishedCited by 5,330 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Rule 52(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure permits a criminal conviction to be overturned on direct appeal for “plain error” in the jury instructions, even if the defend*154ant failed to object to the erroneous instructions before the jury retired, as required by Rule 30. In this case we are asked to decide whether the same standard of review applies on a collateral challenge to a criminal conviction brought under 28 U. S. C. § 2255.

I

A

Joseph Frady, the respondent, does not dispute that 19 years ago he and Richard Gordon killed Thomas Bennett in the front room of the victim’s house in…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5,330 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

5,325 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API