Legal Opinion

Winnetka Partners Ltd. Partnership v. County of Hennepin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 3, 1995No. C0-94-2275PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.

The facts in this ease are undisputed. Appellant, Winnetka Partners Limited Partnership (Winnetka) owns an apartment complex in the City of New Hope known as New Hope Terrace. On July 28,1986, Winnetka’s predecessor, New Hope Terrace Limited Partnership, in exchange for tax increment financing, entered into a minimum assessment agreement with the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of New Hope (HRA). The agreement set the market value' of the property at a minimum value of $6,000,000 to be increased 2 percent per annum compounded. The Hennepin County Assessor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Charles W. Sexton Co. v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. State Ex Rel. County of Hennepin v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. First National Bank of Barron v. StrimlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. State Ex Rel. Gresham v. DelaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Willoughby v. GrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. McLane Minnesota, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  5. JME of Monticello, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API