Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1955No. 36,421PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Plaintiff seeks to review and vacate a nonappealable order by mandamus.

This matter arises pursuant to an order directing the trial court to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not issue commanding it to vacate an order granting a new trial, or in the alternative, if mandamus for that purpose is denied, requiring the trial court to vacate said order and to make a new order based exclusively on evidence presented to the jury.

Two trials have resulted in verdicts for the plaintiff and the granting of new trials. After the first trial, defendant appealed from an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Smith v. HavelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. State ex rel. Lum v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Greenberg v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Rush v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rueth v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. MT Properties, Inc. v. CMC Real Estate Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Northwest Publications, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Winnetka Partners Ltd. Partnership v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API