Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. County of Hennepin v. Brandt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 16, 1948No. 34,602PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Writ of quo warranto issued from this court upon relation of the county of Hennepin, with the consent of the attorney general, directing respondent to show by what warrant he holds the office of member of the board of tax levy for said county.

The board of tax levy for Hennepin county was created by, and exists pursuant to, Sp. L. 1879, c. 338, as amended by Sp. L. 1885, c. 84, and Sp. L. 1887, c. 110. Section 1 thereof as amended provides:

“Section 1. There is hereby created and constituted in and for the county of Hennepin, a board which is hereby designated and shall be known…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  2. Hamlin v. KassaferOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Gress v. EvansSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1877
  5. Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. BorgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. District of Columbia v. Acme Reporting Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Goodfriend v. Board of AppealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. Barber Pure Milk Co. v. Alabama State Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. In Re the Estate of HitchmanWashington Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API